Jul 082018
 

I am hard at work writing up my listening impressions for the First Watt SIT-3 stereo power amplifier review for Positive Feedback, which I hope to have completed in the next few weeks or so.

Until the review is published, I thought you would enjoy a “sneak peek” into the upcoming review – enjoy!

¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ The First Watt SIT-3 Stereo Power Amplifier by Nelson Pass ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪

Pretty much everyone involved in enthusiast audio has heard of Nelson Pass, and for good reason, as Nelson has been a central figure in the audio design world since the mid-1970’s.

Nelson at home enjoying a glass of wine during a listening session with Positive Feedback Editor David W. Robinson. Photograph by David W. Robinson, copyright (c) 2018, all rights reserved.

I asked Nelson if he would tell me a little about his early years, about how he first got involved in music and audio in the period prior to his adventures as the audio designer we know him as today.

Nelson told me, “I was born in Massachusetts and the family moved to Los Angeles in 1957, and then to Santa Rosa in 1958, where I grew up until I went to University of California, Davis (UC Davis) in 1969. From a fairly early age my radio ran all night long. My neighbor friend and I built a lot of stuff and eventually these two activities merged into DIY audio. I was building speakers when I was 15, but I started playing inside amplifiers a couple years later.”

Nelson started studying physics at UC Davis in 1969, earning a Bachelor of Science in physics in 1974. During his time as a physics student at UC Davis Nelson founded his own company to design and manufacture loudspeakers, called PMA, and was also hired by ESS to do research and development related to loudspeaker crossover and enclosure design work. Nelson arrived at ESS just before Oskar Heil who developed the famous ESS AMT 1 “Air Motion Transformer” loudspeaker.

Nelson worked at ESS during 1972 and 1973, a period where he gained a lot of knowledge about audio circuit designs through studying the schematics for op-amps in the National Semiconductor application books, and by repairing all brands of amplifiers for Sun Stereo as a service manager.

During that time in audio interest in solid-state amplifiers began to eclipse interest in vacuum tube amplifiers as audio enthusiasts began to desire more powerful amplifiers. A lot of the solid-state amplifiers of that period were using Class AB or Class B designs, but they didn’t sound too good compared to the Class A vacuum tube amplifiers, so interest rose in developing high-powered Class A solid-state designs that had better sound quality.

Nelson told me that his first unique amplifier design was in 1973, a Class A solid-state design. Nelson continued to incorporate what he was learning about sound quality and solid-state circuits into his own amplifier designs, and in 1974 Nelson and a colleague from ESS, René Besne, left ESS and founded Threshold Audio in December of 1974, the same year that Nelson graduated from UC Davis with a physics degree.

Threshold 800A power amplifier.

Nelson designed the amplifier circuit and selected the circuit components, and René did the industrial design to develop the amplifier’s appearance and ready it for production. Their work resulted in the Threshold 800A amplifier, which was a Class A amplifier that had 200 watts per channel output into 8 Ohms, with an innovative dynamic bias approach that helped reduce power consumption and heat while maintaining Class A sound quality. The Threshold 800A amplifier would go on to be a favorite of audio engineer and founder of Stereophile, J. Gordon Holt, as well as audio enthusiasts around the world.

Pass Labs

Nelson left Threshold Audio in 1991 to found Pass Labs so he could enjoy broader investigation into his own audio design interests. Today through Pass Labs Nelson offers a full range of audio electronics including amplifiers, preamplifiers, integrated amplifiers, and even a headphone amplifier.

Pass Labs’ current power amplifiers cover a broad range of audio enthusiast interests from the massively powerful and beautifully constructed X600.8 monaural amplifiers capable of delivering 600 watts of superb performance into 8 ohms for the most challenging loudspeaker loads (above), all the way down the power scale to the svelte XS25 stereo amplifier that delivers 25 watts per channel into 8 Ohms, that has been receiving accolades from reviewers for its lower-powered musical finesse on easier to drive loudspeakers (below).

The Pass Labs website describes Nelson’s approach to building amplifiers, “At Pass we build amplifiers with excessive output stages, huge heat sinks and massive power supplies. We use the highest quality components in simple linear topologies, assembled and tested with great care in Auburn, California. They measure well and sound great. They are heavy, reliable and expensive.”

Now allow me to take you back in time for a moment to the late 1980s and early 1990s to a parallel audio universe, where American audio enthusiasts began to become interested again in very simple and relatively affordable low-powered single ended triode (SET) vacuum tube amplifier designs for their exceptionally musical sound quality. Individuals like Don Garber (300B SET photo below), Herb Reichert, JC Morrison, Gordon Rankin, and others began building amplifier designs that were embraced by the “audio everyman” searching for a “sound of live music” reality.

There was really no one during the late 1980s and early 1990s building affordable and simple single-ended analogs of SET amplifiers with solid-state devices like metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET), junction gate field-effect transistors (JFET), or static induction transistors (SIT), until in 1997 when Nelson released the Pass Labs Aleph 3 (below).

The Aleph 3 was relatively low powered at 30 watts per channel, and was described by Nelson as, “… the first of the newest generation of amplifiers from Pass Labs. This design results from my commitment to create the best sounding product, a simple circuit having the most natural characteristic. The Aleph 3 integrates power MOSFET devices and pure single-ended Class A operation in a simple two-gain-stage topology with the sole purpose of recreating subjectively natural sound.”

Pass Labs Aleph 3 circuit.

While I have very much enjoyed the musical delights of low-powered single-ended triode or pentode amplifiers (SET and SEP, respectively), intrigued by the Pass Labs Aleph 3, I bought one in 1997 to see how it compared to the vacuum tube amplifiers I was familiar with.

MOSFET power curves

The Aleph 3 used MOSFETs in its simple single-ended Class A circuit, and it turns out that MOSFETs (and JFETs) have power curves (above) that look quite similar to the power curves for pentode vacuum tubes (below).

Pentode power curves.

Over the years I have really enjoyed the pentode circuits I have listened to, like that of the 5-watt per channel Almarro A205A integrated amplifier, for example, that uses EL84 vacuum tubes in a single-ended pentode circuit, and which I still enjoy listening to today powering my vintage Altec 832A loudspeakers.

I thought the Aleph 3 compared favorably with the SET (and SEP) designs I was familiar with, but it had the added benefit of 30 watts per channel output, which opened up a broader range of loudspeaker compatibility than most SET vacuum tube amplifiers could accommodate.

I loved the Aleph 3’s no-nonsense appearance with its huge heat sinks encircling the chassis, its ultra-reliability, and its low cost of maintenance (no expensive vacuum tubes to replace), not to mention that its power output of 30 watts per channel sounded great on my Spendor SP-1/2 loudspeakers in the apartment I lived in at the time.

I thought the Aleph 3’s price of $2400 USD was fair as well, and it was something that I could actually afford to buy as an audio enthusiast back in 1997. In 2018 dollars the Pass Labs Aleph 3 would go for $3751 USD, which is comparable to the First Watt SIT-3’s price of $4000 USD that is the subject of this review.

The Aleph 3’s simple design, excellent sound quality, greater loudspeaker flexibility, high reliability, low cost of operation, and affordable price made the Aleph 3 a hit with audio enthusiasts, and for the first time there was a single-ended solid-state design that was a viable alternative to low-powered SET or SEP amplifiers.

Pass DIY 

Nelson had become intrigued by the performance possibilities of low-powered amplifiers and wanted to continue his exploration into interesting low-powered amplifier designs (and other stuff), which didn’t really fit into the Pass Labs product lines.

Towards that end in 1998 Nelson founded Pass DIY and First Watt to explore novel amplifier designs in an environment unfettered by commercial concerns.

Nelson’s long involvement in and appreciation for do-it-yourself (DIY) audio is described on the Pass DIY website.

“Nelson Pass has been an early contributor to the audio DIY scene; It has been said that Nelson has a knack of explaining engineering things very clearly in a few words, and that he obviously enjoys doing it. He is also a very active contributor at www.diyaudio.com. Being very generous with advice, tips, and complete amplifier designs that people can build.”

Nelson says, “I like to speak to the teenager (me) who wanted to know this stuff – that’s my audience. There are always people who appreciate a decent explanation that gets to the meat and potatoes. I see it all as light entertainment with a little education thrown in. The academic paper approach has its place, but it seems intended for people who mostly understand the stuff already. If you want to communicate with DIYers, you depend more on colorful analogies, a little hand waving, and very little differential calculus. I get lots of personal satisfaction out of the whole enterprise. It gives me an outlet for some cool ideas and things that otherwise would stay bottled up, and I have an excuse to explore offbeat approaches purely for their entertainment value. Also, the process of communicating DIY stuff is a two-way street – I would say I get about as much as I give.”

Nelson enjoys giving away designs to the DIY audio community, as well, and he loves the creativity of the DIY community.

Nelson also regularly participates in and supports the yearly Burning Amp Festival which draws DIY audio enthusiasts from around the world.

Nelson likes simple amplifier circuits because they tend to sound better, and also because by studying the possible variations in simple circuits and their component parts you can get a better understanding of how an amplifier can deliver a particular signature sound.

Most vacuum tube audio circuit designs have been well developed and documented over time, and they are well understood, but in the realm of solid-state there are a high-amount of amplification devices and circuits that remain to be investigated.

A solid-state device that Nelson thought deserved further investigation in simple Class A circuits was the vertical field-effect transistor (VFET).

Sony VFET

Nelson said, “Examples of VFETs were produced by Sony and Yamaha forty years ago and appeared in power amplifiers produced from about 1975 through 1980. These amplifiers are now prized for their exceptional sound, the credit popularly going to the linearity of the VFETs. They were called VFETs at the time because they have a vertical (not lateral) structure. The subsequent invention and dominance of vertical MOSFETs (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor) made use of the term confusing, so now they are generally referred to as static induction transistors (SIT), except perhaps as reference to these original parts.”

Power curves for a Sony 2SK82 VFET.

The Sony VFET had power curves (above) that looked a lot like the power curves for triode vacuum tubes, like the 300B (below), and they were notable for their rich, dimensional, and natural “triode-like” sound quality.

300B power curves

Nelson says about the Sony VFETs, “I began working with these transistors as well, and the first result was an amplifier presented at the 2013 Burning Amp Festival in San Francisco. It was a push-pull Class A circuit consisting of only three parts, one each of the 2SK82 and 2SJ28 and a small Jensen coupling transformer. (This did not count the power supplies). It delivered 20 watts at reasonably good gain and low distortion and did so without feedback. I am told that it sounded very good …”

Nelson would go on to offer DIY enthusiasts amplifier kits using the Sony VFETs through www.diyaudio.com.

First Watt

First Watt is Nelson’s audio equivalent of the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works that develops advanced and/or secret aircraft projects in an environment that is unhindered by the usual commercial or bureaucratic concerns, like the famous U-2 or SR-71 Blackbird spy planes, for example.

In that same “skunk works” spirit of exploring the cutting edge of innovation, Nelson says, “First Watt exists because I wanted to explore a variety of amplifier designs in what I think of as neglected areas – amplifiers that might not fit into the mainstream and are probably not appropriate to my more commercial enterprise, Pass Labs. With oddball characteristics and output power ratings of 25 watts or less, First Watt is not for most people. If you have efficient loudspeakers, listen at reasonable levels and are obsessed about subjective performance, then you probably have come to the right place. If you want reliable audio product, then you really have come to the right place. For twelve years First Watt has had a near-zero failure rate.”

Nelson has now developed seventeen First Watt amplifiers at the cutting-edge of sound quality and musicality, and they all have 25 watts or less output into 8 Ohms.

All of the First Watt amplifiers feature minimalist circuits with little or no feedback and are highly innovative design approaches to Class A circuits, using either metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET), junction gate field-effect transistors (JFET), or static induction transistors (SIT), and with some of the designs being current sources instead of the more usual voltage sources, often being single-ended, and sometimes having no voltage gain at all!

Aficionados of low-powered tube amplifiers ooh and ahh over the musical and sonic performance of the 300B, 2A3, 45, and PX25 triode vacuum tubes developed in 1938, 1932, 1929, and 1935, respectively, and the 1920’s and 1930’s were certainly good years for developing great sounding low-powered triode vacuum tubes.

Some audio enthusiasts may not realize it, but MOSFETs were developed in 1959 by Dawon Kahng and Martin M. (John) Atalla at Bell Labs; JFETs were first patented by theoretical and applied physicist Heinrich Welker in 1945 (Westinghouse and Bell Labs); and SITs were developed by Japanese engineers Jun-ichi Nishizawa and Y. Watanabe in 1950, all within the period that is oft’ cited as the Golden Age of Audio.

Until Nelson started his investigations into low-powered MOSFETs, JFETs, and SITs used in simple Class A circuits, no one had really applied the same sort of careful attention to solid-state devices as had been done by audio experimenters working with the 300B, 2A3, 45, and PX25 triode vacuum tubes that you might have read about in the Japanese audio experimenters periodical MJ Audio Technology, whose first issue was published in 1924.

Nelson’ First Watt amplifier designs have often been compared to these low-powered vacuum tube single-ended-triode (SET) amplifier designs for their sheer musicality and sonic prowess, though Nelson is quick to point out that his designs “… are not designed to mimic tubes as such. These amplifiers share some of the characteristics of the better tube products in that they have simple circuits with minimal or no feedback and emphasize performance of individual gain devices. In some ways they are better than tubes, in other ways perhaps not.”

The proof is in the listening though, and if you’ve had an opportunity to listen to Nelson’s First Watt amplifiers you know they are extremely good in terms of musicality and sonics, and they are certainly competitive with the single-ended-triode (SET) vacuum tube amplifiers I have owned.

Nelson’s First Watt amplifiers also have the added benefit of reasonable prices and extreme reliability, and with no expensive vacuum tubes to periodically replace, they also have very low life-cycle costs for the audio enthusiast.

Nelson’s interest in exploring SIT-based amplifiers at First Watt continued to grow, and then one day Jeff Cassidy at SemiSouth contacted Nelson about the possibility of doing a custom run of silicon carbide SITs.

Nelson said about the event, “Sometimes, though, things just fall into your lap. A couple years ago I was talking to Jeff Cassidy at SemiSouth and he mentioned that at one time they had made a special run of static induction transistor devices on some kind of military/industrial contract, and that one of their technical people had remarked that they were nearly ideal for use in audio amplifiers. “Really”, says I, “Do you have any of them left over?” No, the customer scooped them all up, but they would be interested in making more. The price of a small run was astronomical (to me, at least) and I spent quite a bit of time pondering the risk. And then I wrote the check and didn’t look back. After a few months I had a small batch of SITs with my name on them, and I started playing. It took about a year and a half to arrive at the designs of the SIT-1 and SIT-2 amplifiers, and it has been a revelatory experience.”

The eventual result of those “skunk works” SITs from SemiSouth was that in 2012 Nelson introduced the SIT-1 monaural amplifiers and the SIT-2 stereo amplifier based on his new custom SemiSouth SITs.

Nelson says about them, “Both were rated at 10 watts per channel and used the SIT as the only gain device, operated without feedback in Common Source Mode, which delivers both voltage and current gain. The two amplifiers were the most successful in the history of First Watt and were made into 2017 (emphasis mine – Jeff).”

For just a moment let’s think about Nelson’s statement that the SIT-1 and SIT-2 were the most successful amplifiers in the history of First Watt. If you’re like me you are wondering what made Nelson’s SIT-1 and SIT-2 amplifiers so successful with listeners. I think it would be too simplistic to just say that listeners liked the way they sounded, even though that’s true, the question becomes “What exactly was it that listeners liked about the way the SIT-1 and SIT-2 amplifiers sounded?”

300B power curves

Well, it turns out that the Nelson’s custom run of SemiSouth silicon carbide SITs sounded really good, with their performance being modeled after the power curves of triode vacuum tubes, so the answer to the single ended SIT-1 and SIT-2’s popularity was that they sounded very much like the best single ended triode (SET) vacuum tube amps. Let that sink in for a moment.

Power curves for a Sony 2SK82 VFET.

Nelson said about the SIT-1 and SIT-2, “The SIT devices allow operation with only one gain stage. In fact, the SIT-1 has only one transistor in the entire amplifier, without feedback and even without degeneration. It’s as simple and raw an amplifying circuit as you could imagine. I have built such simple amplifiers before using MOSFETs and power JFETs, but I was not at all prepared for the quality of sound that I got with the SITs. It was like magic. The SIT-1 and SIT-2 are special amplifiers. They have single gain stages – the input signal goes into the gate of the SIT and comes out the drain amplified and driving the loudspeaker. There is no feedback or degeneration. They run single-ended Class A …”

SIT-1 circuit

Nelson says there are three primary advantages of triode vacuum tubes and SIT power transistors for audio use. The first is that they allow you to build an amplifier with a single gain stage that provides both current and voltage gain, while having high input impedance and low output impedance, so no feedback is necessary. Secondly, you can choose a voltage-current load-line that provides very low distortion. Thirdly, their soft overload characteristics mean that when they’re driven hard to clipping they distort gracefully by producing compressed and rounded waveforms instead of unpleasant sounding sharp clipping.

Nelson goes on to say, “Unfortunately triode performance is limited partly by the need to transform the high voltage / low current operation of the triode down to the low voltage / high current domain of loudspeakers. This means a transformer and all the distortion comes with it. Of course, it would be nice if triodes drove speakers without transformers.”

The SITs don’t have the transformer issue SET amplifiers, so there is very little distortion, and you could think of the SIT-1 and SIT-2 a little bit like an output transformer less (OTL) 300B single ended triode (SET) amplifier.

The First Watt SIT-3 Stereo Amplifier

Now to add to the intrigue of the popularity of the SIT-1 and SIT-2, Nelson has for 2018 released his third version of an amplifier based on his custom run of SemiSouth “skunk works” static induction transistors, the very innovative and creatively designed First Watt SIT-3.

First Watt SIT-3 power amplifier.

The new SIT-3 is a Class A stereo amplifier using Nelson’s SemiSouth SIT power transistor and puts 10 watts into 16 Ohms (as with my vintage Altec loudspeaker collection), 18 watts into 8 Ohms (as with my Tannoy Westminster Royal SE loudspeakers), and 30 watts into 4 Ohms.

The SIT-3 differs from the SIT-1 and SIT-2 in that it operates in Common Drain Mode rather than their Common Source Mode.

Nelson explains their differing operational modes by saying, “The channels of the SIT-1 and SIT-2 consisted of a single SIT operated in Common Source Mode in which (conceptually) the signal comes into the gate and appears amplified at the drain pin, but phase inverted. The source pin is grounded. The amplification with Common Source operation is both voltage and current, and the phase inversion is corrected by reversing the output terminals. The SIT-3 goes in another direction, using Common Drain operation, where the signal goes into the gate pin and comes out the source pin and the drain of the FET is grounded (literally attached to ground). This mode only provides current gain – voltage gain is provided by a high-quality voltage step-up transformer which takes the input signal from a preamplifier (or other device) and boosts the voltage. There is no phase inversion at the loudspeaker terminals.”

Nelson goes on to say, “In both approaches, the SIT does a good job of amplifying the signal without feedback, but Common Drain operation delivers the amplification with much lower distortion and noise and also a much better damping factor for the loudspeaker. The trade-off is the addition of the input transformer, but I think you will find the compromise there is small with respect to the sound quality. Common Drain has the same simple spectral distortion character that graced the SIT-1 and SIT-2 and allows similar control of the amplitude and phase of the second harmonic content, but at a much lower distortion figure.”

If you look closely at the power output of the SIT-1, SIT-2, and SIT-3, you’ll notice that the SIT-3 outputs 18 watts into 8 Ohms, almost double the 10 watts into 8 Ohms of the SIT-1 and SIT-2.

I asked Nelson how the SIT-3 achieves an output of 18 watts compared to the SIT-1 and SIT-2’s 10 watts, given that they all share the same SemiSouth SIT device.

Nelson said, “It (the SIT-3) is unique because it operates in a push-pull topology I call DEF – the depletion type N channel SIT is mated with an enhancement type P channel MOSFET to form a self-biasing Class A power follower. Apart from elegant simplicity, this has the square-law character of a triode circuit but with more current available to the load. Compared to the single-ended SIT-1 and 2, this push-pull Class A has twice the power into 8 ohms, eight times the power into 4 ohms, 10 times the damping factor, and one-fifth the distortion while having that second harmonic character. This follower stage does not provide voltage gain, so the SIT-3 uses a high-quality auto-former to boost the preamp voltage by 11 dB, buffered by push-pull JFET followers to give an input impedance of 200K Ohms.”

Simply speaking, the output stage of the SIT-3 is a push-pull depletion/enhancement mode follower (DEF) which delivers about twice the output current of the single-ended SIT-1 and SIT-2 amplifiers.

Here’s a circuit schematic of the First Watt SIT-3 stereo amplifier:

SIT-3 Circuit

About it Nelson says, “You can see the input JFET followers driving the auto-former, which develops voltage gain for the power output followers. Besides the unusual DEF / SIT output stage, you might notice the inverted power supply, which dramatically reduces supply noise seen by the SIT. This design requires careful selection of the characteristics of each SIT matched to the MOSFET – their gate voltages must be carefully matched, and fortunately this SIT device falls into the range where such matching is possible. The actual circuit is hardly more complicated and includes a few new tricks to get both the purest square-law performance with solid stability.”

Nelson’s home listening room during a recent visit by Positive Feedback Editor David W. Robinson. Photograph by David W. Robinson, copyright (c) 2018, all rights reserved.

I should mention that Nelson is very proud of the First Watt SIT-3 and how it turned out, and he says, “This is one of those all-night, year-after-year pieces.” Note the First Watt SIT-3 in Nelson’s home listening room in the photo above.

¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪

Ok, that’s it for now! That should suitably whet your appetite for the review of the First Watt SIT-3  at Positive Feedback in the coming weeks.

I’ve been enjoying listening to the First Watt SIT-3 in my Westminster Royal SE loudspeaker based system.

Next the First Watt SIT-3 will be migrating to my vintage Altec loudspeaker-based systems for a little more musical fun and games!

As always, thanks for stopping by, and may the tone be with you!

 Posted by at 1:05 pm

  10 Responses to “Sneak Peek: The First Watt SIT-3 Stereo Amplifier Review for Positive Feedback!”

  1. Nice write-up Jeff. Good work. Pete

  2. That amplifier should be a match made in heaven for the Altec A5 & A7 Stokowski.

    It’s always fun to read you.

    • Thank you, Rémi, I truly appreciate your kind words! 🙂

      The SIT-3 has been impressive on my Westminster’s, and I am definitely looking forward to trying the First Watt SIT-3 on my vintage Altec’s – it should be fun!

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  3. Hi Jeff,

    it would be ideal if you could compare this First Watt amp with the Pass Labs XA25. FYI…I’ve spoken over the phone with a dealer who has tried both amps, and he seemed to prefer the XA25. I suspect that many speakers, possibly including the Tannoy’s, might appreciate having just a bit more power. I’m interested in trying one of these type of amplifiers, as I have mostly tubes amps now (McIntosh MC30s at your recommendation & Shindo Cortese) and have never tried a class A solid state amp. The big 90 pound amplifiers with sharp heat sinks don’t make sense to me, too bothersome to move around, but a smaller amp seems like an appealing option. I was thinking trying a new amp would be a little like tube rolling….wish I had the space to have a speaker collection like yours.

    All the best, Mark

    • Hi Mark,

      That’s some fantastic equipment you’ve got there, very nice choices!

      I’ve heard a lot of praise for the Pass Labs XA25, but due to their popularity they’re hard to come by, so it’s not likely I’ll get a chance to compare them directly. Comparing the XA25 to the SIT-3 isn’t really an apples-to-apples comparison though, as I understand it the design focus of the XA25 is more for conventional loudspeakers of moderate sensitivity, and not to compete against the best DH-SETs on highly sensitive loudspeakers, which is more the purview of the SIT-3. I doubt one could go wrong with either though, it just depends on what loudspeakers you have and how you would use the amplifier.

      I’ll go into the power output aspect of the First Watt SIT-3 in depth in my review, but I have been impressed with how they’ve fared with my Westminster’s, and there were only a few times when I would have liked to have more power on tap when pushing the SPLs into the 98dB to 100+dB SPL range. The West’s are not the easiest speakers to drive in spite of their highish sensitivity of 99dB, so it’s a good showing for the First Watt SIT-3.

      My usual MC30 monaural amps will put out about 60 watts on peaks before they run out of steam, so they’re more powerful than one would expect for what Mac calls a 30 watt amplifier. The ASR Emitter Blue MOSFET-based amplifier I reviewed in 2013 was rated for 250 watts per channel into 8 Ohms, and the West’s absolutely loved the ASR! Most of the time the ASR was just loafing along, but it always had a lot of power in reserve for peaks, and that gave an incredible ease to the presentation of the music. Extra power on the West’s can get addictive.

      If I sat you down with a blindfold on and had a Cortese, a pair of MC30’s, and the SIT-3 on hand, and played musical chairs with them on the West’s, and asked you to identify which one was solid-state and which one was tubes, I suspect the First Watt SIT-3 might not be the one you pick as being solid-state. Or you might just call BS on me and say they’re all tube amps! The SIT-3 is a genre breaking amplifier, that’s for sure.

      I suspect the SIT-3 will really love my vintage Altec loudspeakers, and I am looking forward to trying that combination.

      Much more to come!

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  4. Jeff,

    This is great fun and quite informative.

    A few years after I moved to San Diego a new hi-end audio store opened in the mid-’70s, Audio Directions. They offered carefully selected brands not found in other area audio stores. That included Threshold. The owners initiated a series of presentations by owners/designers for the brands they carried, that included a young man named Nelson Pass of Threshold. It was also the formation of the original San Diego Audio Society.

    When Nelson came for his presentation, Audio Research and conrad-johnson were leading the way back to appreciation for tube based electronics, a little over 10 years after the emergence of solid state electronics in home audio. So naturally after Nelson completed his talk about design of Threshold components, someone in the audience ask why he focused on solid state when the sonic benefits with tubes had been reestablished. After so many years I couldn’t attempt to quote Nelson but he essentially answered that he fully appreciated the sonic realization of vacuum tubes. But he was more intrigued by the potential implications and challenges with solid state devices. He may even have said, “transistors are cool!”, a popular expression of appreciation of the times. As your article relates, he never gave up that exploration, even 40 years later.

    So while I must admit I’ve not had any of his amps in my systems over the years I’ve always admired his design trail-blazing, his product reputation, and his no BS attitude. How could you not respect a guy who advertises for his products, “They measure well and sound great. They are heavy, reliable and expensive.” ;^)

    • Hi Pryso,

      Great comment! I love the dedication Nelson has shown to developing electronics with solid-state devices, and he sure is advancing the art of solid-state design based on what I am hearing from the SIT-3, which is an amazing amplifier regardless of Nelson’s choice of SITs over SETs (an attempt at humor!).

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  5. Jeff, what a wonderful article, I loved the history and the pictures. By the way, I have a Pass Labs XA25, an XA30.8 and the SIT 3 still at my house until the California Audio Show. They all three sound great and which one I like best depends on the speakers. Ony my Teresonic XRs I like the 30.8, but with the QLNs I much prefer the SIT 3. In many ways, I wish I had never let the SIT 1s leave my house. The 30.8 builds its sound from the bass up and the other two from the midrange out. My Teresonics also build from the midrange out which is why I think the 30.8 compliments them so well. The XA25 is a very musical amp but does not have quite the beautiful tonal colors of the SiT3. Some people will prefer one and some the other, but I think the SIT3 is really special.

    Thanks again Jeff for such a wonderful piece.

    Jack

    • Hi Jack,

      Thanks for the kind words, appreciated. 🙂

      Sounds like you’re having quite a bit of Nelson Pass inspired fun!

      One of the things that I have found with Nelson’s amplifiers is that they are very responsive to the power cords used. I’ve found the stock power cord doesn’t allow for the full performance that Nelson’s amplifier designs are capable of, so as part of the review I thought I’d briefly articulate the results of choosing a high-performance power cord to get the maximum performance from the SIT-3 that it is capable of.

      I hope you are doing well, Jack!

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)

%d bloggers like this: