Jun 122018
 

Today’s exciting arrival is the First Watt SIT-3 stereo amplifier, which was designed by – and in the case of this particular SIT-3 amplifier – hand-built by Nelson Pass himself!

The First Watt SIT-3 stereo amplifier designed by Nelson Pass.

I consider Nelson’s First Watt amplifier designs to be an artistic expression of what is possible at the cutting edge of audio performance, and as such they are state-of-art minimalist circuits designed with the ultimate musical and sonic performance in mind.

Simplified SIT 3 topology schematic.

Nelson’s First Watt amplifiers also tend to be lower power designs, and in the case of the SIT-3 that means 10 watts into 16 Ohms (my vintage Altec loudspeaker collection) 18 watts into 8 Ohms (as with my Tannoy Westminster Royal SE loudspeakers), and 30 watts into 4 Ohms.

SIT stands for static induction transistor (i.e. a VFET), which is what the First Watt SIT-3 uses in its power stage, and Nelson says it has the character of a tube triode.

Static Induction Transistor

The SIT-3 is the 3rd iteration of Nelson’s First Watt SIT stereo amplifier design, thus the “SIT-3” designation, and it differs from the SIT-1 and SIT-2 in that the SIT-3 is operated in common drain mode, rather than common source mode like the SIT-1 and SIT-2.

Common source mode provided both voltage and current gain for the First Watt SIT-1 and SIT-2 amplifiers, but common drain mode in the SIT-3 provides only current gain, so Nelson utilizes an autoformer in the SIT-3 to boost voltage by 11dB.

Nelson says, “The SIT-3 has more power, more damping factor and less distortion than the
previous designs. It retains their desired second harmonic character with even fewer
higher order harmonic components … The SIT-3 has an organic quality that breathes more depth and
life into the music … This is one of those all-night, year-after-year pieces.”

As always, I’ll have a lot more to say about Nelson Pass’ First Watt SIT-3 stereo amplifier, and will be providing some first impressions before long, so stay tuned!

¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ 

Postscript 1: Yesterday my buddy Ron stopped by to listen to the new First Watt SIT-3 stereo power amplifier that had arrived from Nelson Pass, and we had a nice time listening to the rich, dimensional, nuanced, and natural sounding SIT-3.

First Watt SIT-3 (right) and vintage Fisher SA-100 stereo amplifier (left)

The SIT-3 was changing by the moment as we listened to it warming up and running in, and there’s still a lot of run-in that needs to occur, but suffice it to say that the not-quite fully-baked SIT-3 never sounded less than delicious and beguiling.

I’ll have a lot more to say about the SIT-3, but just as a word of advice, if you have an inkling that you would like to have a First Watt SIT-3 stereo amplifier of your very own, and have loudspeakers that can be driven with 18 watts or less, you may want to consider buying one of these quickly before they sell out, as there won’t be many made.

The First Watt SIT-3 is the first amplifier I’ve listened to in a long time that I thought could entice me away from my restored and hot-rodded vintage McIntosh MC30 monaural amplifiers – it’s really good, and it isn’t even completely run-in yet!

Much more to come about the First Watt SIT-3 in due time!

¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ 

Postscript 2: Well I’ve now got the First Watt SIT-3 properly installed into my Westminster Royale SE based system, and my vintage Mac MC30 monaural amplifiers are sitting forlornly off to the side of the room.

First Watt SIT-3 installed into the Westminster based system.

Nelson Pass’ First Watt SIT-3 is a ridiculously good amplifier, displaying both accomplished musicality and sonics.

I forgot to say in my last postscript that I put one of Mark Coles’ Sablon Audio Gran Corona power cords on the SIT-3 in place of the stock power cord, and as I’ve experienced with other Pass amplifiers, a really good power cord makes a huge difference in performance. If you’ve got a Pass or First Watt amp and are still using the stock power cord, you haven’t really heard what your amp is capable of yet, so you’ve got an adventure to look forward to!

I’ve been listening to the SIT-3 a lot with both the Soundsmith Zephyr Mk III and Carmen Mk II phono cartridges as I’m finishing up the review of the Carmen Mk II for Positive Feedback, and they are exquisite together!

I’ll have a lot more to say about the First Watt SIT-3, so stay tuned for more!

¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ 

Thanks for stopping by, and may tone be with you!

 Posted by at 9:17 am

  8 Responses to “Today’s Fresh Catch: The First Watt SIT-3! Postscript added x2.”

  1. Looking forward to hearing more!

    • There will be lots more to come, Joseph! I can tell you that I’ve now got it hooked up to my West’s and the SIT-3 is sounding mighty fine. The SIT-3 sounds rich, transparent, and musical, and at 18 watts has just enough power to make the West’s sing.

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  2. Exciting news, Jeff — I’ve been waiting for the reviews of the SIT-3 to start coming in.

    Coincidentally, I only very recently bought a FirstWatt F7 just to try out, and so far I’m impressed.

    • Hi Richard,

      The First Watt SIT-3 amps are just starting to ship out, so you should start to hear more about them soon.

      My friend Ron and I had a chance to give the SIT-3 a good listen today, and it never sounded less than very nice. It changed significantly in sound even over the time we were listening to as it got some time on it, sounding rich, natural, transparent, and very nuanced.

      I’m going by memory here, but if I remember correctly, one of my friends – Rahul – has an F7. I thought it sounded really good when I heard it over at his house.

      These First Watt amps are really nice!

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  3. Hi Jeff,

    Somewhat on the heels of your initial experience with the First Watt SIT-3 which you may have auditioned on your Westminsters, I had a unique experience today. I visited a friend who owns the Tannoy Kingdom Royals. He has been auditioning amps and was near the end of a trial with the Pass SA60.8. More watts and more dollars than your amp but oh what an experience! I’m not particularly a soundstage freak, being more interested in tonality and dynamics. But I must say I’ve never hear reproduced music with such depth and specific instrument placement. As a bonus I heard inner musical details from a couple of recordings I brought along which I’d never experienced before. And as I might have guessed, the tonality and dynamics were outstanding. So my reason for writing is not to degrade the First Watt at all, but to suggest you try to now audition a Pass amp(s) further up the food chain line. ;^)

    Also, I had not visited the Tannoy site for some time. Just now I was not able to find any downlinks to their Prestige line. That is topped off by the Westminsters and Royals for readers not familiar with Tannoy. Do you know anything about that?

    Thanks

    • Hi Pryso,

      The Pass gear is really nice, and I would of course love to hear the SA60.8 mono’s on my Westminster’s one day, I suspect it would be a really nice match.

      I’ve heard quite a bit of Pass gear over the years (even owned the delightful little Aleph 3 way back when), and have always enjoyed what I’ve heard from it.

      I don’t see how your friend could go wrong with the Pass amps matched to his Kingdom Royals. Here’s a tip for him: use really good power cords on the Pass amps, there’s way more performance inside them than you’ll hear with the stock power cords.

      First Watt is Nelson’s “skunk works” where he develops amplifiers at the cutting edge of musicality and sonics, though, which is why Nelson wanted to send it to me to hear, and as I understand it, Nelson is very excited about the SIT-3’s level of performance.

      The SIT-3 is the benefactor of all of Nelson’s latest thoughts and research into the cutting edge of amplifier design – it is a remarkable amplifier, and I have been very impressed with it.

      There’s a couple of caveats though, the first being the number of SIT-3’s to be produced is very small and will likely sell out quickly, so chances are most people will never get a chance to hear one, which is unfortunate.

      Secondly, the First Watt SIT-3 is low powered at 18 watts into 8 Ohms, so you have to have very sensitive loudspeakers to hear what all the fuss is about, and my Westminster’s just barely fall into a sensitivity range that complements the SIT-3 (the Kingdom Royals probably are not sensitive enough, based on my own experience with them here at my place).

      I can achieve 100+dB sound pressure levels with the SIT-3 on my West’s, but there’s times when even a little more dB would suit certain rock & roll music, like when you’re trying to blow the windows out of the room at 110-120dB or so!

      I’ll be looking forward to trying the SIT-3 on my vintage Altec’s too, which are even more sensitive than the West’s.

      Much more to come on the SIT-3 in time!

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

  4. Hi Jeff,

    I listened Kingdom Royals on Montreal Show in March.
    I was disappointed by their sound a lot.
    The dealer that presented Tannoy has new transistor McIntosh amplification in the show room.
    Kingdom Royals sounded very dynamic but the base was booming and I really didn’t like a sound of Kingdom Royals super-tweeters.
    Yes I understand that it is very difficult to get right opinion about speakers from show like this.
    But in any case dealers has to do better job to setup better sound.

    Regards,
    Alex.

    • Hi Alex,

      The Kingdom Royals can sound really good with careful setup. The pair I had here sounded really nice once I got the setup dialed in. Ultimately I preferred my Westminster’s presentation of music, which suited my personal preferences better, but the Kingdom Royals were really good speakers that I think many people would be thrilled to own.

      I imagine the choice of Pass electronics with their smoothness and richness would be a really good choice for the Kingdom Royals, but I haven’t heard that combination myself.

      Kind regards,

      Jeff

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)

%d bloggers like this: